Μπορεί να μην έχω πάθει την μεταμουντιαλική κατάθλιψη που αναφέρεται παρακάτω, αλλά επειδή ήμουν οπαδός της Ουρουγουάης στο Μουντιάλ, επειδή εκτιμώ αφάνταστα τον Eduardo Galeano σαν συγγραφέα, και επειδή διάβασα στα σχόλια του 
http://mhmadas.blogspot.com/ παραγγελιές για άρθρο σχετικά με την Ουρουγουάη και τον Φορλάν, σας παραθέτω (δυστυχώς στα αγγλικά επειδή είμαι σε πολύ καλοκαιρινή διάθεση για να κάνω την μετάφραση) το άρθρο του συγγραφέα για το παγκόσμιο κύπελλο, που το ψάρεψα από το 
http://enathinaisbios.blogspot.com/ που και αυτό το είχε ψαρέψει από ξένες ιστοσελίδες (μα καλά, πόσο τεράστια πρόταση έγραψα;).
The Magic Kingdom
by Eduardo Galeano 
Pacho Maturana, Colombian, a man of vast experience in these matters,  says that football is a magic kingdom, where anything can happen.  The  recent World Cup confirmed his words: it was a strange World Cup. 
Strange were the ten stadiums where the matches were held, beautiful,  immense, which cost a fortune.  No one knows what South Africa will do  to keep these cement giants in operation, a multimillion-dollar waste  that is easy to explain but difficult to justify in one of the most  unequal countries in the world.
Strange was the Adidas ball, half mad, which kept slipping out of  hands like a soap and disobeying feet.  The so-called 
Jabulani  was imposed on the players, who didn't like it in the least.  From  their castle in Zurich, the masters of football impose, rather than  propose.  Such is their custom.
Strange it was that, at last, the all-powerful bureaucracy of the  FIFA recognized, at least, after so many years, that it was necessary to  study how to help referees in decisive judgments.  That is not much,  but it is still something.  It was about time.  Even these voluntary  deaf men had to hear the cries let loose by some referees' errors, which  in the last match became horrendous.  Why do we have to see on  television screens what the referees didn't and perhaps couldn't see?   Clamors of common sense: just about all sports -- basketball, tennis,  baseball, and even fencing and auto racing -- regularly use modern  technology just to be doubly sure.  Football?  No. 
Referees are authorized to consult an ancient invention called the  watch, to measure the duration of matches and to make an allowance for  lost time, but it is prohibited to go beyond that.  The official  justification might seem comical, if not downright suspicious: errors  are part of the game, they say, leaving us speechless in awe of the  discovery that to err is human. 
Strange it was that, in the first World Cup in Africa in the history  of football, African countries, including the host, were eliminated in  the first stages.  Only Ghana survived, till its team was defeated by  Uruguay in the most exciting match in the entire tournament.
Strange it was that, though a majority of African teams kept their  agility, they lost their audacity and fantasy.  A lot of running, but  little dancing.  There are those who believe that the teams' technical  coaches, almost all Europeans, contributed to this cooling.  If that is  so, they did little favor to the style of football which promised so  much joy.  Africa sacrificed its virtues in the name of efficacy, and  efficacy was conspicuous by its absence.
Strange it was that some African players were able to shine, yes they  did, but in European teams.  When Ghana played against Germany, the  Boateng brothers, Black brothers, faced each other: 
one wore a Ghanaian shirt, and 
the other a German shirt.
Of the players of the Ghanaian team, none played in the local  championship in Ghana.  All the players of the German team played in the  local championship in Germany.  Like Latin America, Africa exports the  hands and feet of labor.
Strange was the best save of the tournament.  It wasn't the work of a  goalkeeper, but of a striker.  The Uruguayan forward 
Luis  Suárez stopped with both hands, inside the goal line, a ball that  would have eliminated his country from the World Cup.  And, thanks to  this act of patriotic madness, he was sent off but Uruguay wasn't.
Strange was the journey of Uruguay, from down below to high above.
Our country, which had barely taken the last spot in the World Cup  after a tough qualification, played the game with dignity, never giving  up, and became one of the best.  Some cardiologists warned us, in the  press, that too much happiness can be dangerous for health.  Numerous  Uruguayans, myself included, who had seemed doomed to death by boredom,  welcomed this risk, and the streets of the country became a fiesta.   After all is said and done, the right to celebrate the merits of our own  is always preferable to the pleasure that some feel at others'  misfortune.
We ended up in fourth place, which isn't so bad for the only country  which made it possible to prevent this World Cup from becoming nothing  but a European Cup.  And it was no accident that Diego Forlán was chosen  as the best player of the tournament.
Strange it was that the champion and the runner-up of the previous  World Cup went home without even opening their suitcases.  In 2006,  Italy and France went toe-to-toe in the final match.  Now they met again  at the departure gate of the airport.  In Italy, voices critical of the  style of football played to prevent the rival team from playing  multiplied.
In France, the disaster provoked a political crisis and inflamed  racist furies, for nearly all players who sang la Marseillaise in South  Africa were Black.  Other favorites, like England, didn't last long.   Brazil and Argentina suffered cruel baths of humiliation.  
Half a century ago, the Argentinean team was 
pelted with a barrage of coins when they came back  from a disastrous World Cup, but this time the team was welcomed by an  embrace of the multitude who believe in more important things than  victory or defeat.
Strange it was that the best known and most anticipated superstars  hardly stood out.  
Lionel Messi wanted to, he did what he could, and we  saw something of him.  It is said that 
Cristiano Ronaldo was there, but no one saw him:  perhaps he was too busy trying to find himself.
Strange it was that a new star, unexpected, emerged from the depth of  seas and rose to the highest firmament of football.  It is an octopus  who lives in an aquarium in Germany, from where he issued his oracles.   His name is 
Paul, but he may as well be called Octadamus. 
Before each match of the World Cup, he was given mussels, each of  them bearing the flag of one of the rival teams.  He ate the winning  team's mussels, unerringly. 
The octoped oracle had a decisive influence on bets, his oracles were  awaited around the world with religious reverence, he was loved and  hated and even calumniated by some upset people, like myself, who came  to suspect, albeit without proof, that the octopus was corrupt.
Strange it was that at the end of the tournament justice was done,  which rarely happens in football or life.  Spain won, for the first  time, the world championship of football.  After almost a century of  expectation.
The octopus had foretold it, and Spain refuted my suspicions: it won  fair and square, it was the best team of the tournament, for the works  and grace of its solidarity football, one for all, all for one, and also  for the astonishing skills of this tiny wizard called 
Andrés Iniesta.  He proves that sometimes, in the  kingdom of football, justice exists.
When the World Cup began, at the entrance of my home I hanged a sign  that said "Closed for Football."  By the time I took it down, one month  later, I had played 64 matches, my beer in hand, without getting off my  favorite armchair.
That heroic feat left me spent, with painful muscles and sore throat;  but I'm already feeling nostalgia.
I'm already beginning to miss the unbearable litany of vuvuzelas, the  excitement of goals not recommended for heart health, the beauty of the  best plays replayed in slow motion.  And also the celebration, and the  mourning, for sometimes football is a joy that hurts, and the music that  celebrates a victory of those who can make the dead dance, near the  resounding silence of an empty stadium, where, after the nightfall, some  defeated man continues to sit, alone, unable to move, in the middle of  the vast deserted stands.
 Eduardo Galeano is a writer.  The original article "El reino mágico" was published in Público.es  among other publications on 13 July 2010.  Translation by Yoshie Furuhashi
Υ.Γ. δεσμεύομαι μέχρι το τέλος της εβδομάδας που θα φύγω από τη Νίσυρο να έχω ανεβάσει το επόμενο τεύχος του ΝΙΟΥΣΛΕΤΕ σε pdf.